Reframing, Part 1: Reframing Education

There’s a great blog post on reframing at Salon.com. The author, Dave Pollard, focuses on reframing common (and false) business myths, and it’s fascinating to see how he reframes each one. His new perspective and questions allow us to completely rethink assumptions that stifle creativity and positive change.

What are common education myths that could use some reframing?

  • We must have a national standard curriculum that is delivered to all children.
  • The only way to find out if students have learned the subject matter is to test them using national and state standardized tests.
  • Rewarding schools that have high standardized test scores and withholding funds from those that don’t will improve student learning.
  • Schools are not the place to teach or discuss values.
  • The national and state curricula are not biased but humane education is.
  • Property taxes are a fair and just way to fund schools.

How could we reframe these with questions that inspire creative and practical answers?

  • Given the world we live in today, what knowledge and skills do young people most need in order to be successful, contributing members of today’s world?
  • How can we know if students are gaining this knowledge and these skills? What projects, tasks or ideas might they launch or generate to demonstrate their abilities and knowledge?
  • When schools fail to educate students with the knowledge and skills they need, what should we do to help them become successful?
  • What values do we consider universal and important for leading peaceful, sustainable, and humane lives, and how can we invite students to identify and embody these for their own and society’s benefit?
  • What biases are in each curricula we use? How can we best teach students to identify these biases so that they are good critical thinkers?
  • What methods can we use to fund education so that every child is able to receive a good education from pre-school through college?

If you have ideas or comments on these questions, by all means share them! We need to solve our educational challenges, and reframing the questions may open the doors for new, healthy ideas.

~ Zoe

The Hidden Costs of Shopping at Wal-Mart

There’s an article in the Detroit Free Press by Georgea Kovanis titled, “Yes, I’m shopping at Wal-Mart.” It’s a paean to a store formerly vilified by cultural creatives and eco-consumers. But with a tough economy, even people who have eschewed Wal-Mart for years are starting to shop there as money becomes tighter with rising fuel and food costs. Plus, Wal-Mart has been working hard to change its image, adopting green slogans, organic food, and hiring consultants, such as Adam Werbach, formerly the president of the Sierra Club, to help them accomplish their goals in sustainability. Thus, Ms. Kovanis feels justified and tries to convince her readers that shopping at Wal-Mart is now good.

But Ms. Kovanis didn’t convince me with her examples. She writes:

“A couple weeks ago I spent $2.50 on a Wal-Mart plant that was $4.99 at the nursery up the street. I stumbled upon DVDs for $5 and I’ve stashed away the fairly new releases to give as Christmas presents. And my favorite fat-free sugar-free Jell-O instant pudding mix is 25 cents cheaper than at my regular grocery.”

We might ask if there are even more thrifty and sustainable ways to satisfy these desires. For example, why not take a cutting of a friend’s houseplant (free), or give homemade cookies, coupon gifts for fun activities, or cool found objects from nature as Christmas presents? And there really are healthier and tastier options for dessert, such as local fruits in season (supporting our health and local farmers at the same time).

The problems associated with Wal-Mart, and all of the big box chain stores, are many, but they are hidden. When strapped for cash, those hidden problems recede even further from our willingness to make an effort even to view them. Whether the problems are the collapse of local economies, sweatshop labor abroad, fuel-intensive transportation costs, local water pollution and increased traffic accidents, excessive materialism, waste accumulation and disposal from extra (and largely unnecessary) items, there are costs, far greater ones than are apparent in the cheap price tag on the individual items. Costs certainly not explored by Ms. Kovanis.

I wish writers like Ms. Kovanis would delve just a bit deeper before justifying Wal-Mart purchases in a tight economy. Would our thrift-conscious, depression-era-surviving grandparents have thought that shopping at a cheap chain store was the answer to a slowing economy, or would they have advocated true thriftiness with a commitment to purchase well-made, long-lasting items when necessary?

~ Zoe

The New Yorker Cover of Barack and Michelle Obama

By now, most of us have heard about the recent New Yorker magazine cover depicting Barack and Michelle Obama in the White House, fist pumping in their Muslim and terrorist garb while the American flag burns and a picture of Osama Bin Laden looks on. I grew up in Manhattan, and The New Yorker magazine arrived at our doorstep weekly. I loved the cartoons, and I grew to enjoy reading the essays and stories when I was old enough to appreciate them. And truth be told, I felt a bit smug about my appreciation for this rather elite magazine that only truly appealed to the highly educated and highly literate. Yup, I was a proud member of that liberal elite so disdained by the so-called “red states,” even though the very concept of the liberal elite was created by the conservative elite.

This recent New Yorker cover, however, unveils the seed of truth that generated the disdain for the liberal elite. It’s clever all right. All those stereotypes and lies thrown Obama’s way this past year all artistically executed in one cartoon. The New Yorker so elite it can show the rest of the world their prejudices and fears all in one fell swoop of a cover. But at what cost? For whom was that cover drawn? For the liberal elite to laugh at the silly racism, bigotry, and fear of the less educated masses? To discuss at art openings in Tribeca?

Barack Obama represents a historical tide change that so many people have worked so hard to achieve. The New Yorker subtly diminished that achievement, leaving us to ponder why we don’t want to continue the effort to break down persistent forms of bigotry, rather than reinforce them.

~ Zoe

Valuing Teachers/Valuable Teachers

Teacher in front of enthusiastic studentsAs an educator, Woody Allen’s famous line in Annie Hall still haunts me. “Those who can’t do, teach, and those who can’t teach, teach gym,” he quipped to big laughs. As a teenager watching the film for the first time, I laughed, too. I certainly wasn’t considering teaching as a profession back then. No status, poor pay, little respect. Woody Allen was right, and I had my sights set on something important; I went to college pre-med.

Years later, I became an educator despite Woody Allen, but as I said, his line still haunted me: did I become a teacher because I couldn’t do something? I’ve come to realize the answer is a resounding no. I could do plenty of things. I choose to teach because I believe that we must raise a generation with the knowledge, tools, and motivation to create solutions to global challenges and create a better world. I teach because I love inspiring and empowering people to live their lives as meaningfully and positively as possible. I teach because I believe that good education is one of the most important gifts we can give others. I teach because I can think of no nobler, more meaningful, or more important work for myself. I teach precisely because it is the best thing I can do.

Yet, our society still grants teachers little respect, even less pay, and hardly any status. And it shouldn’t come as a surprise that while many brilliant, inspiring, enlightened people go into teaching as a profession, many others go into teaching for less than noble reasons. A few years ago, I learned that a certain state university (which will remain unnamed) accepts people into its M.Ed. program who have a C average from college. I find this disturbing.

We want our doctors and lawyers to be exceedingly smart and well-educated. We expect our college professors to be not only highly intelligent, but also wise. But we don’t have very high expectations of the teachers who will be paving the way for our children’s future on countless levels, not least of which is their passion for and ability to pursue lifelong learning.

I’ve written in this blog that I believe the purpose of education should be to provide the knowledge, skills, and inspiration for people to live sustainably, peaceably, and humanely, but I’ve not written much about teachers. We need to build a society in which the very brightest, wisest, most inspired and inspiring people go into teaching — not just at the university level, but in primary and secondary schools, too. We need to value our teachers the way we value our physicians and pay them accordingly, so that such people are drawn to education, not just to medicine, law, and business.

There is no easy formula for this. But there are some steps we can take:

  • If you are a parent, show your gratitude and respect for your children’s best teachers. Let them know how important they are. Share books and websites with them (such as HumaneEducation.org) so they can learn more themselves.
  • If you are a teacher, honor yourself. Woody Allen was wrong. Realize the potential you have to make an enormous impact on the lives of your students as well as on the world. Be a lifelong learner, and commit to bringing humane education to your students. Doing so may reawaken your passion for and commitment to your chosen profession.
  • If you are an educational reformer, brainstorm ways in which we can begin to pay teachers better and more equitably across communities. Meet with other educational reformers to draft policy ideas and share these.
  • If you are a concerned citizen, write letters to the editor, your own blog posts, or simply voice your commitment to education – help build a society which values education and hence attracts more and more valuable teachers.

Our motto at the Institute for Humane Education is “The world becomes what you teach.” We believe that we will build a better world when we teach for such a world. Nothing is more important than the teachers who will do this great work.

~ Zoe

What Does a Spectacular Education Look Like?

I’ve been contemplating the next book I will write. One idea is to write a book about what’s wrong with our educational system and how we can fix it. That’s a cumbersome title for a book, so for now, let’s call it A Spectacular Education. I don’t pretend to know how we create schools and school systems that work for all children, how we fund such schools, or how we find the kinds of teachers and administrators who will make them spectacular, but I intend to find out.

I already know what schools should be for. To me the goal of education must become to provide the knowledge, inspiration, and tools for living healthy, sustainable, humane lives that contribute to a peaceful world. How we achieve this is the substance of my book-to-be, and my intention is to offer a variety of approaches and ideas which policy-makers, teachers, parents, and educational administrators can explore to create spectacular schools and healthy educational systems for the next generation.

I would love to hear your ideas. Do you know a school that works, teachers I should meet, administrators who are exceptional educational leaders, policy-makers who have vision and expertise, books or films I should read or see? Please share with me what you know and have experienced.

Thanks for your help!

~ Zoe

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 424 other followers