There are some who argue that education is virtually always synonymous with indoctrination, and those who hold this position certainly have evidence to support it. The U.S. government removed native children from their homes, put them in boarding schools, forbade them from speaking their own languages, and indoctrinated them with very specific values and beliefs. These practices continue today with children from indigenous families around the world who lose their languages and cultures as they head off to boarding schools that aim to help prepare them for a very different future than village living. The Dairy Council has been producing “educational materials” for schools and indoctrinating several generations with the belief that we need dairy products for our health, which is patently false. Corporations in general utilize schools to indoctrinate students and influence them to prefer their products over others and to become productive workers within a global, corporate culture.
But this does not mean that education is by its very nature indoctrination. We mustn’t confuse education with schooling, because they are not synonymous. Education happens all the time, through interactions, mentoring, reading, apprenticeships, observation, and simply living. Of course it also happens in school where specific subjects are taught and we gain new skills and knowledge. Schools can be places where indoctrination takes place in a wholesale fashion, as when it serves a specific ideology and seeks to produce graduates who have specific beliefs, rather than simply a breadth of knowledge and skills. And schools can also be places where indoctrination is subtle but still pervasive. But schools do not have to be places of indoctrination. Certainly, we are all enculturated in school, but this is not the same.
The definition of indoctrinate is this:
in·doc·tri·nate vt
to teach somebody a belief, doctrine, or ideology thoroughly and systematically, especially with the goal of discouraging independent thought or the acceptance of other opinions
School can and should be one of the very best places to encourage independent thought, critical and creative thinking, and broad understanding of and appreciation for a multitude of perspectives. Rather than reject schooling as indoctrination, as some are doing, we need to be developing and promoting schools that are committed wholeheartedly to exposing students to a variety of viewpoints and providing them with the most important tools for their future: problem-solving, and critical and creative thinking along with a deep commitment to living lives that contribute to a healthy world.
Zoe Weil
Author of The Power and Promise of Humane Education and Most Good, Least Harm
Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.
Filed under: accurate information, creativity, critical thinking, Cultural Issues, education, propaganda, values Tagged: | accurate information, creative thinking, critical thinking, education, independent thought, indoctrination, propaganda, schooling, teaching, third side thinking

The Power and Promise of Humane Education
Above All, Be Kind: Raising a Humane Child in Challenging Times
Claude and Medea: The Hellburn Dogs
So, You Love Animals: An Action-Packed, Fun-Filled Book to Help Kids Help Animals

IHE offers online courses for educators, activists, parents & concerned citizens seeking the tools, knowledge & motivation to align their actions with their deepest values & to become more effective leaders and changemakers. Sign up now for an upcoming session.


I find your take a bit puzzling, because I have (outside of Pink Floyd lyrics) never encountered an adult who wanted to remove schooling to avoid indoctrination—which would be the only scenario occuring to me where your statements truly make sense.
Apart from this extreme, however, it must be said that schools tend to be anything but what you describe: Yes, they could and should be places where students learn critical thinking, etc.,—but they only very rarely are. (And this criticism, I have encountered on many occasions from many different people.)
As for indoctrination, it can be minimized, but never entirely removed—and often it is a severe problem. (Notably, even if the school system, it self, is neutral, there can still be problems with too partial teachers. This in particular, if teachers are disproportionally recruited from certain groups.)
Above all, it would be extremely dangerous and potentially harmful to take an untroubled view (I am not saying that you do) that schools can be good; therefore, they will be good in the future; therefore, we need not bother—and we can forget all about this indoctrination crap. On the contrary, we should strive to point out the risks and prevalence of poor teaching, lack of critical thinking, and indoctrination. In other words: Raising awareness, not trivalizing.