Refuse Revisited

My husband and I recently kayaked out to Long Island in Blue Hill Bay. This 4.7 mile long island is uninhabited by humans, and we had the beach to ourselves the night we spent there. After landing on the island, we decided to explore the interior. We found an old trail and several piles of moose poop reminded us that while there may have been no humans on the island, there were certainly large mammals! But moments later, we discovered the unfortunate evidence of humans – a beer can. I found myself feeling that not only was the landscape marred, our very trip was marred by this act of careless littering.

A few minutes later, my husband pointed out another beer can, and I felt my ire grow. Ten minutes later he noticed another. This time, I just asked him not to point them out. We didn’t have a trash bag with us, and I didn’t want to be ceaselessly reminded of humanity’s less thoughtful side.

But it became harder and harder to ignore them, especially the many that hung from tree branches. By then, we were both thinking of the Blair Witch Project and wondered what creeps had decided to turn these magnificent woods into a den of freaky, hanging beer cans.

Long into the hike, we took a side trail, although trail is a strong word for what was quite challenging to follow. The beer cans gave way to what at first seemed like graffiti on trees. The letters LA had been deeply etched into a big section of one tree, followed by several trees with vertical X’s. Were these marking a path? Seemingly so.

The next morning we decided to take a another hike, although we didn’t plan to return to the beer can trail, preferring to find some other areas to explore. And what we found was magnificent. Ancient oaks, once cut at the trunk had grown sprawling and enormous. Sweet huckleberries and blueberries still clung to their stems, providing breakfast. And within 5 minutes of each other, my husband and I both found deer antlers, mine shed within the year, his quite old and gnawed by rodents.

We realized that we were getting somewhat lost, and my husband’s iPhone with its GPS was just about out of batteries. We’d forgotten a compass, and the sky had clouded up, obscuring the sun, which would have enabled us to know what direction we were heading. So we did our best to navigate back a bit uneasily. And soon enough we found one of the trails. This time, however, the beer cans were strangely reassuring, marking the trail as they did.

I can’t say I came to like the beer cans, but I did appreciate them. Hanging from branches, they stood as beacons – albeit trash beacons – and I was glad not to be lost on this large island. When we return, I will be bringing a big trash bag to gather up the refuse, but it was strange how over the course of 24 hours my response to the beer cans could go from rage to relief.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm and The Power and Promise of Humane Education

Image courtesy of racineur via Creative Commons.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

The Change of Seasons

Over the past several days flickers have been gathering at our house. Dozens of them. I rarely see flickers, and then suddenly, they are everywhere, eating insects in the grass. The dragonflies are buzzing all over too, not just at the pond where they hatched and spent their first few weeks, but over the grass now, near the flickers. A Great Blue Heron has been hanging out at the pond, eating frogs, I presume – those same frogs who have grown big in the months since I wrote about the deafening evening choruses this past spring. The seasons bring not just changes in temperature, light and color, but behavioral changes among the animals with whom we share this place. If we pay attention, there is so much to notice. Not just the obvious migrations of birds we’ve come to expect in spring, but also the disappearance of the jellyfish once the ocean water warms in summer and the seals who move out to sea and no longer bask in the sun on the nearby rocks in fall.

Advice for the day: pay attention. There are mysteries to be unearthed all around us.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

William Deresiewicz: We Need a World of Thinkers and Visionaries

The American Scholar printed a speech at West Point by William Deresiewicz, titled “Solitude and Leadership” — an interesting and seemingly oxymoronic pair of words. Speaking to some of the brightest, most hard-working future “leaders,” Deresiewicz made an impassioned plea for people who think for themselves, arguing that what we need most at this point in history are people with vision. I’ve been writing in this blog about critical thinking for some time. Deresiewicz said it all perfectly. Do read this speech.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Environmental Responsibility — An Epic Pain in the Ass?

I just read an excellent essay by J.B. MacKinnon, “In an Age of Eco-uncertainty,” reprinted in Utne Reader. MacKinnon begins: “Environmental responsibility, of late, is an increasingly epic-scale pain in the ass….” She goes on to say, “… every possible choice from diapers to cremation is overwhelmed by conflicting information about what’s better or worse for Spaceship Earth. That sound you hear? That’s every ounce of fun being sucked out of your life.”

I just laughed. MacKinnon is spot on and doesn’t hold back when describing “eco-douchebags,” those people whose holier-than-thou judgmentalness crushes every last speck of both blessed denial and even more blessed joy. But while naming the huge challenges we face in choosing accountability (as MacKinnon would say) or MOGO (most good), which I address in my book, Most Good, Least Harm, MacKinnon does not let us off the hook.

Doing nothing is not an option even as we struggle to decide what somethings are worthy of our time and energy and refuse to become self-righteous as we diligently research and strive for the accountability we wish everyone would embrace. Her rule of thumb for choosing which somethings to do? Those that feel like an adventure. That’s a nice alternative to epic-scale pain in the ass.

Zoe Weil

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Rubie, Elsie, and the Stick

Most days, I walk my dogs, Ruby and Elsie, down to the ocean. Invariably, Elsie finds a stick to bring home, although stick is really a misnomer. Little Elsie is more likely to carry home a small tree than a stick, and Ruby and I anxiously check our backs because Elsie tears along the path with the stick, banging it into us at high speed if we’re not quick enough to scoot off the path and into the woods. Ruby has taken to jumping aside long before Elsie can ram that stick into her. This morning, I was not so quick. Elsie came up so suddenly that the stick whacked the back of my legs. I sternly said “No, Elsie,” and she looked chagrined. She begin running through the woods with it and avoiding me, but because it’s hard to carry a tree in your mouth through the woods, she changed the angle, carrying it to the side so that the length of the tree was parallel to her body rather than perpendicular to it. What a smart girl, I thought. Yet, why shouldn’t she be smart? Why should I be at all surprised that she’d modify her behavior at my command? She does it all the time.

Although Elsie doesn’t speak English, she has learned far more “human” than I have learned “dog” in our amazing cross-species relationship. She adjusts to me daily, reading my voice, my posture, my movements, my moods, my desires, and tweaking her own behavior to meet both my and her own needs. I have done little to adjust to her, expecting that she will be the one to change – to go to the bathroom only when I let her out and where I expect her to go, to eat only when I provide food and not to eat or chew on the various things in the house that are off-limits (like the CDs and the furniture), to lick only as much as I am comfortable with and no more, to get off the bed on command but know that she is generally welcome to sleep there as long as she doesn’t take “my” space, to “obey” sit, stay, come, lie down, high five, hug, leave it and a few other choice commands, not to mention learning to carry her sticks a new way through an obstacle course of woods rather than a wide open path. She continues to learn how to better suit me while I blithely carry on with no concerted effort to speak her language or follow her “rules.”

Yet I know that her life is an utter joy largely because of the home and life we’ve created for her and Ruby and Griffin (too old now to run to the ocean). I’m happy she’s willing to always adjust so that the back of my legs won’t be whacked by her stick obsession.

Zoe Weil
Author of So, You Love Animals: An Action-Packed, Fun-Filled Book to Help Kids Help Animals, Moonbeam Gold Medal winner for juvenile fiction, Claude and Medea: The Hellburn Dogs and Most Good, Least Harm

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

49 Rolls: Honoring Aging

The eve of my 49th birthday, at the end of my Aikido class, I did 49 rolls. It’s a tradition in our and other dojos that on our birthdays we do as many rolls as years we’ve lived. It’s a bit counter-intuitive though. When my young friend Zak turned 16 this summer, he only had to do 16 rolls. Why on earth would we do more and more as we age?! Imagine a centenarian taking a 100th roll!

Yet I love this tradition, one that honors our great capacity for endurance with each passing year. That invites us to celebrate age with more, not less, of what we’re capable of. It’s a way of honoring age with the greatest degree of respect and admiration.

I look forward to 50 rolls in 2011 and to the belief that I can achieve ever more as I age, not less.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm

Image courtesy of babasteve via Creative Commons.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

A Plea for Critical Thinking

A couple of months ago, I was watching a film with my colleagues that was largely aligned with our general worldviews, and I tried to the best of my ability to bring the same critical eye to this film as I would to one that was not aligned with my worldview. It took effort, obsessive note-taking, and commitment.

Most of us tend to believe what supports our worldview and disbelieve what does not. To me, this may be one of the most dangerous impediments to positive change and growth, and watching people parrot opinion disguised as fact dashes my hopes again and again that we can truly create a peaceful, sustainable world.

I recently watched a film on YouTube produced by the New Left Media that showed clips of interviews with people attending Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally earlier this month in DC. The perspective of the producer is clear, and we all know how editing can cast interviewees in a negative light, promoting the agenda of the director. A film produced by a “New Right Media” of a left-leaning rally would probably be as equally unflattering to the interviewees as this film was.

Even knowing that the producers had an agenda, there is no way to fully distort the words of the interviewees. Glenn Beck has said on Fox News that Obama is a racist, but at least one person at the rally refused to believe this. Yet this same person readily believed myriad other things that Glenn Beck and others say to him, reinforcing his worldview.  And sadly, don’t most of us do this regardless of our politics and beliefs?

This post is not meant to condemn any ideology or group; rather, it’s meant as a plea to all of us to commit ourselves to the hard work of thinking critically, of believing nothing until we have ascertained its truth, of hearing many perspectives and refusing to accept the “truth” of TV soundbites, especially when they come from opinion pundits rather than reporters and when they simply reinforce our own worldview.

There are many problems in the world, many atrocities happening as I write these words, a planet in the process of warming, species becoming extinct at alarming rates, yet there is nothing that makes me despair as much as a populace that willfully refuses to think critically.

The greatest hope for our future lies with a generation that has been taught critical and creative thinking as the most essential tools for problem-solving. That generation will not come about, however, if we ourselves refuse to embrace these skills and if we continue to deny it the greatest path for a healthy and peaceful future.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm and The Power and Promise of Humane Education

Image courtesy of critical thinking asylum via Creative Commons.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Seeing the World From Another Side: Aikido and MOGO

Last night I was teaching our Aikido class because our sensei was away, and one of the students was talking about what he perceived as some others’ faulty views. Then he reworded what he’d said, reframing his point by saying that these others may simply have different views from his own.

The first technique we practiced had us moving in such a way that when someone tried to punch us we wound up facing the same direction. Safe from harm, we stood right next to our “opponent,” gazing toward the same wall. We could see the world from his perspective. I pointed out that this technique actually served as a metaphor for this student’s comment. Can we see the world from another’s perspective – one that is different, perhaps sometimes faulty?

If instead of responding to an attack with a block and counter-attack, we deflect, move out of the way, and face the same direction by blending, we have a multitude of opportunities for response. We can figuratively and literally see the world from another’s eyes. We are safe but close, neither fleeing from the conflict nor resorting to violence. Our eyes are open to a new angle. This requires flexibility, responsiveness, and the melding of a variety of techniques to be able to adjust depending upon the situation.

Whether faulty or different, we all have views we hold dear and we all find ourselves critical of other views. But if we can react by blending and facing the same direction as others, instead of immediately casting blame, we have the opportunity to find peaceful resolutions to conflicts and develop greater understanding.

It won’t always be the case that conflicts end with acceptance and understanding, but the Aikidoist still attempts to stop the conflict without causing harm. This “most good, least harm” (MOGO) approach in a martial art serves as a reminder that we must continually seek to understand others’ views in order to find the most peaceful resolution to conflicts.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm

Image courtesy of Darij & Anna via Creative Commons.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Meeting a 70-Year-Old Woman Finishing the Appalachian Trail

Yesterday I hiked the last leg of the Appalachian Trail (AT) up Katahdin Mountain in Maine with my good friend and fellow humane educator, Freeman Wicklund. Freeman began the AT in Georgia in March and hiked more than 1,300 miles to Connecticut before a stress fracture in his foot laid him up for a month of healing. He hitchhiked up to Maine on Labor Day to resume the trail, this time heading south.

We started climbing the magnificent, but arduous Katahdin at 8 a.m. While the mountain was open to hikers, it was a “Class II” day meaning that hiking beyond treeline was not recommended. Katahdin was shrouded in cold fog with intense wind gusts. There are sections of the ascent where there are thousand foot drops on either side of a fairly narrow crest. There’s no question that this can be a dangerous mountain.

Just before we broke treeline we passed a small, older woman who had been hiking the AT in sections. She was about to finish the AT at Katahdin, having just turned 70 years old two days earlier. Shortly after meeting her we ran into two tall, strong, fit, 40-something men on their way down. Excited to see people already descending at 11 a.m. (we must be close I thought), I asked about their summit experience. Turns out they hadn’t made it. The stronger and fitter of the two remarked that they’d gotten within 1.5 miles of the top but turned back because the winds were so strong he was almost knocked down (despite, as he said, being 175 pounds). It wasn’t worth it, he continued. I think he was trying to convince himself of the rightness of his own personal decision, so I was not deterred, but I felt uneasy, especially given that I only weigh 96 pounds. I also found myself thinking about the 70-year-old woman who didn’t weigh much more than I. We’d encountered some very challenging climbing, and the rocks were slippery. The winds were already pretty high. If it was going to get even worse, would we make it? Would she?

As the ascent got steeper and more exposed, we encountered a young woman who had hunkered down among some rocks while her companions continued the ascent. She was uncomfortable with the quarter mile of narrow rocks in the high winds. Another warning. Freeman and I carefully continued, staying low and following the 3-point rule (keep three limbs on the rock at all times rather than stand up and walk on the slippery, jagged rocks and risk a wind gust knocking you off the mountain). We made it just fine and hiked the final 1.3 miles on the beautiful and flat Tablelands to Maine’s tallest peak. We ate a leisurely lunch in a spot protected from the winds, missing the successful ascent of the 70-year-old woman we’d met below. But we ran into her and her companion on the way back, and were delighted to know she’d made it. We descended in close proximity, all of us proceeding with some trepidation as the hard spots are often much harder coming down than going up. She managed each of them with such grace, and I found myself in awe of this remarkable woman, who at age 70 had accomplished an extraordinary feat – completion of a 2,000+ mile journey on a harrowing mountaintop. I thought of the much younger, fitter, stronger man we’d passed who’d turned back. I don’t by any means want to criticize his decision. More than half the climbers turned back that day – a wise choice for them. But the tenacity, perseverance, and joyful beauty of this dedicated and strong-willed woman inspired me. She was not at all foolhardy: she planfully prepared, gave herself plenty of time, and took great care in climbing safely. She was not in danger, because she was ready. Ready to succeed at her goal; ready to live every moment of her life fully; ready to embrace her dreams; ready to defy stereotypes that diminish us at all ages.

Would that we all lived with such exuberance and challenged ourselves to achieve all that we are able.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Local Versus Global, Consumerism vs. Simplicity

I was reading an article in the July/August issue of Ode Magazine titled, “If you’ve got it, spend it: How consumer spending can help create a fairer, richer, greener and more stable global economy.” The article is an edited excerpt from Philippe Legrain’s book Aftershock: Reshaping the World Economy After the Crisis. Unfortunately, it’s edited in such a way that it’s hard to fully grasp Legrain’s perspective because the sections don’t always follow logically, and there are inconsistencies in the article that I suspect might not be true of the book. I plan to read the book to understand Legrain’s points better.

Essentially, though, Legrain argues that consumerism – albeit a healthier version than most of us think of when we hear the word – is a primary key to a happier and more just and peaceful world. One of the pull out quotes in the article reads: “Localism, not globalization, is the true enemy of the planet.”

Legrain’s is a fairly unpopular view among progressives of various sorts who are promoting local economies, food independence, and voluntary simplicity as keys to a sustainable, just, and healthy world. And it is one I appreciate. I have found myself grappling with the complexities and sometimes the contradictions of local vs. global, and of consumerism vs. simplicity, for many years. I’ve written about this in my book, Most Good, Least Harm, because it is not always clear what and to whom actually does the most good and the least harm from our choices, especially if we are trying to do the most good and the least harm to ourselves, other people, animals, and the environmental all at the same time.

If I were to choose to eat only foods that are grown locally, as opposed to the criteria that I have chosen (vegan, organic, fair trade), then those organic and fair trade banana growers in Central and South America, from whom I purchase bananas at our local food co-op, would lose a loyal customer. I care about those growers as much as I care about the organic wheat growers in Northern Maine, whose crop I buy whenever I purchase bread or flour. True, the ecological footprint of the bananas is significant, shipped as they are using fossil fuels, but when I imagine a post-fossil fuel world that relies upon sustainable, non-polluting energy, that world has an abundance of global trade. My only reason now for limiting my purchases of distantly-produced products is environmental. I have never been swayed by “localism” for localism’s sake, that is, to “support my local economy.” It feels insular to me. In the same way, I have never understood when the news reports the number of Americans killed in a battle or natural disaster and fails to report the number of non-Americans killed. Personally, I don’t care about Americans more that I care about Iraqis. I care about people.

And so I was glad to read Legrain’s ideas and grateful to Ode Magazine for publishing an unpopular view. Yet, I hope that when I read his actual book (instead of excerpts) it will be more nuanced, and there won’t be either/or scenarios as presented in the quote “Localism, not globalization, is the true enemy of the planet.”

In a complex world, with challenging conundrums and solutions still eluding us, we must think beyond either/ors and attempt to continually ask and seek to answer what does the most good and the least harm in the countless choices that make up our lives. In this way, we can hone our critical thinking skills and harness our creativity to find new ideas that don’t simply refute other positions but which bring us further toward a peaceful, sustainable, and humane world for all people, animals, and the environment.

Zoe Weil

Image courtesy of Sheila’s via Creative Commons.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 437 other followers