Parking Your Luxury Car in Your Living Room—a Critical Thinking Opportunity

When Singapore middle school principal Mike Johnston shared this video of a man living in a luxury apartment building in Singapore parking his high-end sports car in his living room, I thought it might be part of a sci-fi movie or a satiric piece of filmmaking.

It’s not.

But what a great humane education tool such a video is!

Imagine showing this film to a group of high school students and asking what they think of it. My guess is that a lot of them will think it’s very cool. Then imagine discussing it in the context of global issues, poverty, global warming, inequality. Imagine asking questions about rights and responsibilities. About freedom and inequity. Think of the lively discussion that would ensue.

If you do share this video in the context of education, remember to keep your own perspectives to yourself. The job of the educator is to share knowledge and instill the skills of creative and critical thinking, not to indoctrinate with personal ideologies. By using an activity like True Price, which examines the real costs of our consumer choices to people, animals and the earth, you enable your students to come to their own conclusions and devise their own actions to respond to the knowledge they gain.

~ Zoe

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm; Above All, Be Kind; and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDxDirigo talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach
My TEDxConejo talk: “Solutionaries”
My TEDxYouth@CEHS “How to Be a Solutionary”

Continue the conversation! Leave your comment below, and “like” and share this post via your social media sites.

In the Face of Unimaginable Catastrophe, We Must Insist Schools Create Solutionaries

The Atlantic has a series of graphs and a remix of a TEDx talk on global warming that is sobering to say the least.

In the face of this, what shall we do? Where shall we place our lever to have the maximum leverage, the greatest possibility that we will protect our planet from a seemingly inevitable catastrophe?

Each of us has skills and talents to place a lever somewhere where we can have an impact, but if we don’t simultaneously put our societal lever in our educational endeavor, there is little hope that we will have enough informed innovators to take on the tasks ahead quickly enough.

Wherever and however you do the work to avert this looming crisis, please make sure to contact your school boards, teachers, school administrators, educational policy-makers, and politicians, and insist – INSIST – that we educate our children to be the solutionaries they will need to be.

~ Zoe

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDxConejo talk: “Solutionaries”
My TEDxDirigo talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach
My TEDxYouth@BFS “Educating for Freedom”

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.

In Praise of Science & Education: Why Sandy’s Death Toll Wasn’t Worse

Image courtesy of CasualCapture via Creative Commons.

It may seem inappropriate, perhaps a bit crazy, to talk about what went right with superstorm Sandy, but I’ve been struck by how much worse things could have been were it not for the confluence of many good people and many good systems.

It is tragic that several dozen people have died from this storm, and I realize that the death toll has increased each day since the storm and likely will increase further. There are millions without power; there are elderly in high rises who cannot get help, heat, food, or water. But Sandy was a massive storm affecting tens of millions of people in the most populated region of the U.S., and the number of people who have died in the U.S. from this storm is smaller than the number who died from car accidents during the same time period. How is that possible given the magnitude of this storm?

A week prior to Sandy’s landfall, meteorologists predicted the storm’s path with an astonishing degree of accuracy. Sandy was called a “Frankenstorm” for a reason. It was influenced by Arctic air to the north and a cold front and storm to the northwest. Yet the scientists were right on the mark. And because they were, people could prepare. There was time for evacuations; time for sandbagging; time for boarding up buildings; time for Con Edison in New York City to turn off the power to lower Manhattan before the storm did more damage that would delay the eventual return of the subways; time for the Red Cross and FEMA and political leaders in the affected states to prepare and address the worst case scenario. The worst case scenario actually came to pass with the confluence of tide, full moon, wind direction, and Sandy’s landfall. And yet, it could have been so much worse. Far more people could have died.

If this is not a wake up call to deeply, fully embrace education and science I don’t know what is. The scientists proved themselves worthy of our respect and gratitude. And if this is not a wake up call to heed scientists’ warnings about climate change I also don’t know what is. Let’s not forget how much we owe those teachers who trained those scientists; the federal money that has supported their work; and the peer review process that ensures that what is published and shared by scientists is as accurate as possible. Scientists are not perfect, and meteorology and climate science will always be unpredictable, but this is the best we have. In Sandy’s case, we’re lucky we had it.

~ Zoe

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDxConejo talk: “Solutionaries”
My TEDxDirigo talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach
My TEDxYouth@BFS “Educating for Freedom”

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.

What’s the Difference Between Eating Cows and Eating Whales?

As mentioned in a previous blog post, I’ve been reading Sailesh Rao’s excellent book Carbon Dharma: The Occupation of Butterflies. Rao tells a story worth repeating about Dr. Sylvia Earle, the National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence, who recounts a meeting with Kuzno Shima, the head of the Japanese delegation to the International Whaling Commission during the 1990s.

Shima challenged Dr. Earle with this question: “’Americans eat beef, right? What’s the difference between eating steak from a cow and eating whale meat?’ Dr. Earle responded earnestly, contrasting the agricultural production of cows with the wild life of a whale and arguing that there were a billion plus cows on the planet, whereas there were only a few thousand whales left. Shima listened patiently but was not moved, which Dr. Earle couldn’t fathom.”

As Rao read about this encounter in Dr. Earle’s book, The World is Blue, he realized that Dr. Earle was missing a key point. “After all,” Rao writes, “to raise a billion plus cows and other livestock on the planet, humans have appropriated nearly one-third of the ice-free land area of the planet, displacing numerous other species and decimating their numbers. While Americans may not have eaten all the mountain lions, the Indians may not have eaten all the tigers and the Chinese may not have eaten all the Giant Pandas, directly, they all might as well have done so. They certainly caused the habitat losses that have resulted in the near extinction of these magnificent animals through their appetites for beef, milk and pork, respectively. It is these second-order effects on Life of our ever-increasing ecological footprints on the planet that even great scientists such as Dr. Earle have failed to grasp and articulate.”

Rao goes on to say:

“Most Hindus venerate the cow and do not eat beef, but they drink milk and eat cheese. In Western countries, the dairy cow is ruthlessly chopped up into hamburgers as soon as its [sic] milk production declines at the age of four, while the typical Indian cow lives out to an old age of 20 plus years, grazing on forest and other pasture land. This grazing reduces food for the sambhar deer and other wild ruminants which decline in population, putting a downward pressure on the tiger population. And the whole ecosystem suffers. This is why I realized that if I drink milk, then I must be prepared to eat the beef when the dairy cow ceases to be productive and I must be prepared to eat the veal from the male calves of cows in order to optimize my ecological impact. Otherwise, there would be an order of magnitude more cows alive for a given level of milk production, which does happen to be true in India. And as I drink milk in India, I’m effectively eating the tiger and the sambhar deer, etc. Once this realization dawned, I became vegan instantly.”

Given that animal agriculture and meat-eating contribute more to global warming than any other human activity, and given that it causes more habitat destruction as well, diet is perhaps the single most important choice an individual can make. If we don’t want the Japanese to continue whaling, are we prepared to discontinue our destructive habits too?

~ Zoe

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDxConejo talk: “Solutionaries”
My TEDxDirigo talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.  

Reclaiming Mainstream Media: Eschewing Tom Cruise’s Divorce for Meaningful News

A couple of weeks ago I met a wonderful, brilliant, soft-spoken, powerful man: Sailesh Rao. We were both leading workshops simultaneously at the Voyager’s Peace Conference, and as luck would have it, another speaker scheduled to present that day cancelled at the last minute. Because there was an empty slot, Sailesh repeated his presentation, and I was able to hear him. I was captivated by this man, who had spent his career as a high-powered computer engineer and who, after learning about global warming, became committed to teaching about and promoting solutions through the organization he founded, Climate Healers.

Sailesh and I had some time to talk and connect, and we agreed to give each other a copy of our respective books. I’ve been devouring his book Carbon Dharma: The Occupation of Butterflies, and I wanted to share some sections in this and other blog posts. He says:

“Here’s what’s amazing: the greatest story to ever unfold on the planet, our imminent march over a cliff following an invisible Pied Piper, is playing out in slow motion while the mainstream media seems to be strangely apathetic, especially in the United States. As if it has also been drugged into a state of stupor.”

How often I have thought the same thing. How is it possible that in the midst of grave problems and looming catastrophes the media can be focusing on Tom Cruise’s marital problems and child custody issues? I recently met with a group of students from the University of Richmond and asked them to list what they considered the biggest problems in the world. One of the issues that came up was the absurdity of the mainstream media’s focus.

What is OUR responsibility in relation to this strange paradox of our time? I believe it’s our obligation to contact those media we follow and ask them to cover the issues that truly matter and to promulgate the important information of our time. We can also eschew what is petty, gossipy, and unimportant, and commit ourselves to be purveyors of what is of meaning, value, and importance for generations to come.

It is our job to ensure that we do not personally fall into a state of drugged stupor, no easy task in a culture that constantly feeds us messages of instant gratification, the pursuit of happiness through materialism, and satisfaction of our immediate desires over our true yearnings for joy, health, peace, and kindness. But we can be vigilant and diligent in our efforts. The world and all the species on Earth depend upon those of us committed to solving the challenges ahead.

~ Zoe

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDxConejo talk: “Solutionaries”
My TEDxDirigo talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed. 

Banning “Pink Slime” Would Do More Harm

When “pink slime” hit the media, outrage ensued. Many were disgusted and appalled that their meat was full of cow parts that were grosser than other cow parts, necessitating ammonia treatment to kill bacteria (a practice that has been occurring for over 40 years).

But now an analysis in the Washington Post of the effects of banning “pink slime” (could there be a grosser name?) reveals the negative impact such a ban would have both on cows (between 300,000 and 1.5 million more would be killed) and the environment (because of the impact raising cows for consumption has on the environment.)

Sometimes what seems obvious – that “pink slime” shouldn’t be in food – turns out not to be so obvious. When considering what does the most good and the least harm (the MOGO principle), “pink slime” comes out ahead of a ban; yet there’s another obvious choice (less encouraged in the media) that is MOGO. By reducing consumption of animals and animal products in general, there’s less pink slime, less slaughter of animals, less global warming, and less pollution.

For a humane world,

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDx talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Why Are We Eating Less Meat?

Mark Bittman, opinion columnist at the New York Times who writes about food, begins 2012 with a piece titled, “We’re Eating Less Meat. Why?” According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, meat consumption is declining and is predicted to continue its decline. While the livestock industry blames, among other things, the federal government’s supposed “war on meat protein consumption,” which is truly bizarre given that the federal government subsidizes animal agriculture with our tax dollars and buys massive quantities of meat for the school lunch program, Bittman posits that the primary decline in meat consumption is due to a growing population of educated consumers who are choosing to reduce and often eliminate animal products from their diet for three primary reasons: their health, the environment, and concerns about animals. Read his essay here.

For a humane world,

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDx talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.  

Bill McKibben’s Eaarth

I just finished Bill McKibben’s Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet. McKibben, a journalist and prolific author who has focused on environmental issues in general, and global warming in particular, for more than 20 years, is well known not only for his efforts to educate through his writing, but also to motivate. He spearheaded the movement www.350.org to engage people across the globe in taking action to compel a reduction of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to 350 parts per million, a number largely thought to be the sweet spot for maintaining a stable climate.

But as McKibben tells us, it’s too late to maintain a stable climate. We didn’t heed the warnings when we needed to; we plowed ahead with unabated growth on the back of fossil fuels, and we have arrived at planet Eaarth, recognizable as our home planet, but already different.

But while Eaarth is a sobering read, it is not a hopeless one. Unlike some authors who advocate for an end to civilization to “save our planet,” McKibben’s prescription is really not all that radical, though it will be challenging. McKibben takes us on a journey to understand our planetary situation and advocates living in a decentralized manner. Nothing we haven’t done for 99+% of our history, but something that now seems unimaginable, globalized as our economy is. McKibben is no Luddite, though. And the manner in which he embraces our globalized information system – through the Internet – is a reminder that we can lead “sophisticated” lives as 21st century citizens, without unduly trashing our planet, and while slowing the inevitable continued rise in temperatures which pose grave, frightening threats we’ve already begun to experience, and which will certainly escalate.

What I appreciated about McKibben’s book is that it’s not the end of the story. His advocacy for decentralized living is not so hard to achieve, but it is just the first step. We have no idea what ideas will emerge and what possibilities lie ahead, and nothing that McKibben suggests will prevent the creativity of humanity from discovering and developing other solutions to our problems. His advocacy for common sense living does not preclude new ideas, ones I fervently believe will be generated by young people if we would embrace a bigger vision of schooling: to educate a generation of solutionaries.

Eaarth is, I believe, verging on essential reading; heeding its call is also essential, and cultivating your own creativity for solutions the true hope.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm and The Power and Promise of Humane Education

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Jon Stewart’s Humorous Expose of Black and White, Myopic and Self-Serving Thinking

I’m a big fan of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, and recently I watched an episode in which Jon discusses the February snowstorms that hit the Mid-Atlantic states and what these storms mean for global warming concerns. You can see the clip here.

What does it mean when comedy becomes a primary source of reason? Please pass this along.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Competition for the Good #2: As Seattle Goes, So Goes the U.S.?

I’m in Seattle as I write this blog post, marveling at the fact that in this city virtually everything is recycled and people can even put out their compost – including anything biodegradable – on the street to be picked up. If Seattle can do this, why can’t every city across the U.S.? Why are there so few cities and states in the U.S. that even attempt this sort of environmental action? But even as Seattle (and other west coast cities) lead the way here, the U.S. as a country lags far behind on the world stage where several nations — notably Iceland, Costa Rica, Norway and New Zealand — are competing to be the first to go carbon neutral.

I confess that I’m quite competitive – raised as I was in Manhattan and competing every day of my childhood for good grades, a good seat at a movie theater, or on my school’s gymnastics team – and I know I come from a competitive country (note those debate teams mentioned in my last blog post), so I’m struck by the lack of competitive spirit in the U.S. right now to lead the way on environmental restoration, sustainable energy, innovative education for a better future, and carbon neutrality. In our most competitive cities – New York and Washington, DC come to mind – we see little effort and leadership in these arenas.

It’s exciting to see what’s happening in Seattle. I’m ready to follow in your footsteps. Can we get the east coast on board? New Yorkers, Bostonians, Philadelphians , please write your representatives and senators. Let’s join the competition, if it helps to think in this way, and race to a healthy future.

Ready, set…. GO!

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm

Image courtesy of sergis_blog via Creative Commons.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 439 other followers