The Power of One: Israel and Iran – A Love Story?

In previous posts I’ve written about the capacity we now have to collaborate and innovate with people across borders to solve problems. Take a look at the above TEDx talk, “Israel and Iran: A Love Story?” I love how one Israeli man’s ideas have captured the imagination of so many.

Will this graphic designer’s idea lead to peace in the Middle East? I don’t know, but it’s possible. And from this, what may come?

~ Zoe

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDxConejo talk: “Solutionaries”
My TEDxDirigo talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach
My TEDxYouth@BFS “Educating for Freedom”

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.

Politicians’ Failures of Generosity

Image courtesy of Newton Free Library
via Creative Commons.

For my blog post today, I’m sharing a recent post I wrote for Common Dreams, a progressive news site. Here’s an excerpt from “Politicians’ Failures of Generosity”:

“It’s intriguing to me that wealthy politicians, even knowing that the public will scrutinize their charitable contributions, are so strangely stingy. At a time when so many are hurting, it would be so simple to be generous, even for the most self-serving of reasons. Given the rhetoric around “class warfare” and “envy” on the one hand and “sharing the burden” and “fairness” on the other, it’s almost bizarre that these high net worth politicians give so little proportional to their income.

When I was in college, I learned that observant Jews are taught to give 10% of their income to charity—not to their synagogue but directly to those in need. It doesn’t matter if you are a working class Jew or a wealthy Jew, the 10% applies to you, assuming you are not destitute. There is much commentary about what constitutes legitimate charity in Jewish law, primarily focused on ensuring that gifts are well thought out to maximize their benefits. A hallmark is anonymous giving and giving in such a way that the recipients become self-sufficient and prosperous.”

Read the complete essay.

For a generous world,

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDx talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Let Us Learn From the Life of Vaclav Havel

Image copyright European Parliament/Pietro Naj-Oleari
via Creative Commons.

This morning the news reports are focused on the death of Kim Jong-Il. I wish I were hearing more about Vaclav Havel, who also died this past weekend. Both led countries, but while one was an oppressive dictator, the other was a truly great statesman, humanitarian, writer, and truly courageous leader. One practiced totalitarianism; the other spoke out against it and served five prison sentences in defiance of Soviet oppression before becoming Czechoslovakia’s president. That the life and death of a dictator is eclipsing the life and death of one of the 20th century’s greatest people in terms of air time is unfortunate. So today, I’d like to honor and express my gratitude to Vaclav Havel.

When I feel despairing about the state of the world and fear that nothing I do will amount to much in the face of the grave problems we face, the cruelties we perpetuate, I think of Havel, who said this:

“I feel a responsibility to work toward the things I consider good and right. I don’t know whether I’ll be able to change certain things for the better, or not at all. Both outcomes are possible. There is only one thing I will not concede: that it might be meaningless to strive in a good cause.”

If ever I doubt the value of working toward a more humane, peaceful, and healthy world, I remember Havel. I cannot control the outcomes of my efforts, but it will always be meaningful that I do my best and embrace my responsibility to work towards what I believe is good and right.

My his words be of value and inspiration to you, too.

In gratitude to Vaclav Havel.

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDx talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed. 

John Hunter and the World Peace Game

For my blog post today, I want to share an amazing TED talk by educator, John Hunter. Take a look and please share this:

I am hoping to learn more from John and look forward to opportunities we may forge with him to incorporate this brilliant World Peace Game into the future work of humane educators everywhere.

For a humane world,

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDx talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

No Controversy Allowed! On Getting Kicked Out of a Middle School

For my blog post today, I’m sharing a recent post I wrote for Common Dreams, a progressive news site. Here are a couple excerpts:

Imagine our surprise when ten minutes after the presentation we found out that the second one was canceled. The principal – who’d come in a few times during my presentation but wasn’t able to attend the entire talk – felt it was too political and called ahead to stop me from speaking at any other school that day.

Was my talk political? Only if by political we mean that it ultimately had relevance to governance. It was certainly not partisan, and it’s preposterous (and worrisome) to suggest that words like “war,” “healthcare,” and “illegal immigrants” cannot be uttered in schools. What that implies about the learning that is permitted in school is frighteningly 1984-esque.

Was my talk controversial? It shouldn’t have been, but even if some thought it was, we should welcome controversial topics in school. What better place to grapple with differing ideas? If students cannot uncover and discover truths in school and explore systems in an effort to become not only better educated about the realities behind our choices but also gain the power to be conscientious choicemakers and future changemakers through their careers and professions, then what are we hoping to achieve through schooling?…

I do not blame this principal, though. He faces stresses and challenges in his job that I not only don’t know about, but can only imagine make his work as an educational leader difficult. We live in an educational climate that is terrified of controversy, making schooling blander with each passing year, and depriving our children of the critical and creative thinking skills they need to face a challenging and uncertain future. Despite all the evidence that shows that discussing controversial issues in school leads to greater educational achievement, skill, and learning, we shy away from the issues that may be most important and relevant to our children’s future.

Read the complete post.

For a humane world,

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDx talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Instead of Rejoicing at Osama bin Laden’s Death, Let’s Vanquish the Real Enemy

For my blog post today, I’m sharing a recent blog post I wrote for Care2.com, an online community for people passionate about creating a better world. Here’s an excerpt:

Vanquishing the enemy means looking below the surface evil to the ways in which rage, hatred, sociopathy and brainwashing occur, and attempting to find root causes and root solutions.

While it may feel satisfying, and deeply so for those who lost loved ones on September 11, Osama bin Laden’s death represents no solution to hatred and bigotry; minds easily influenced; actions determined more by situations and systems than by careful thought, reflection and analysis. These are the real and powerful roots of evil.

There is a way to confront our biggest enemy, and it lies with children….That way is through schooling that teaches critical and creative thinking and problem-solving and that fosters reverence, respect and a sense of responsibility.

It is, in fact, the only way to cultivate healthy roots so that each of us has the capacity to resist the effects of a destructive environment — whether that environment is political, cultural, economic or ecological — and then transform that environment into systems that are more just, sustainable and humane.

Read the complete post.

For a humane world,

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, Above All, Be Kind, and The Power and Promise of Humane Education
My TEDx talk: “The World Becomes What You Teach

Image courtesy of L. Marie via Creative Commons.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Visiting the Greenpeace Arctic Sunrise and How to Solve Our Energy Challenges

I was in New York City last weekend, and Sunday morning when I checked my email someone new was following me on Twitter. When I sent her a message, I noticed her most recent tweet about the Arctic Sunrise, Greenpeace’s icebreaker, docked at Pier 59 and open for tours during its campaign against dirty coal and for clean energy. So my family headed over, and it was great to tour one of the three Greenpeace ships. I’d been a Greenpeace canvaser in 1984 for a couple of weeks, and had followed Greenpeace’s campaigns over these many years. This campaign included a trip up the east coast to various ports to educate the public.

The tour started off with a view of the ship – a former sealing-turned-anti-sealing vessel in a bit of sweet karma. The rough belly of the ship – with sprayed-on insulation covering all the walls and ceiling – was decorated with a disco ball and a peace dove. At the stern, a group of actors performed a sales pitch for real estate on the top of a mountain – a mountain with its top removed (as in mountaintop removal, a method to obtain coal that is decimating Appalachia). The snarky, though amusing, skit made its point, sort of. But I wondered if visitors with no awareness of mountaintop removal and strip mining really came away with any understanding of what this is doing to communities across Appalachia or how horrifically destructive this form of mining is. Those who already knew didn’t walk away with a plan of action. We just walked to the next phase of the tour.

That last part of the tour included a Greenpeace compilation video of campaigns (without much educational value but interesting to watch) and a brief talk about the campaign and about clean energy versus dirty coal. I asked what Greenpeace’s position was on Obama’s plan – mentioned in his recent State of the Union – about having the U.S. using 80% renewable energy (including “clean coal,” natural gas and nuclear) by 2035. Because he’d been on the ship during the State of the Union address, he said he didn’t know much about what Obama had said; this seemed odd to me, as Obama’s energy plan is certainly easy to find, and, one would think, relevant to Greenpeace and worth a response. My 17-year-old son asked what Greenpeace’s energy position was. How would they replace coal? The response was with solar and wind power, and more efficiency.

When we left, my son was frustrated. The answer seemed so unrealistic. That’s the problem. And I was disappointed that Greenpeace hadn’t done the hard work of coming up with an actual plan to present to us, a “roadmap” toward a clean energy future. We left the tour uncertain, really, of its purpose.

Coal must go, that’s certain. So let’s devote our personal energies to figuring out how to transform our global energy supply successfully and create a truly clean energy future. This will take a massive commitment, a huge investment of funds (probably public funds), a revamping of our energy grid and infrastructure, the full engagement and partnering of disparate utilities, our brightest scientists and engineers and inventors, and a willing and eager public supporting the costs involved.

Right now, we have an administration that understands a clean energy future to be an important goal, but we don’t have a large enough willing populace to forge ahead very easily. And so the real work of those of us who consider ourselves activists for a healthy and humane world, and those groups, like Greenpeace, which have been dedicated to these issues for decades, needs to be to enlist a skeptical public, use our talents and knowledge toward truly viable solutions, and build support for innovation, partnership, and investment in a clean energy future. No easy task.

My goal here isn’t so much to be a critic of Greenpeace, although I realize I have criticized them; it’s to implore all of us who consider ourselves on the forefront of the efforts to create a sustainable future to be strategic, smart, and savvy about what it will take to meet our energy needs. It’s to engage us all as successful solutionaries.

For a better world through humane education,

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm and The Power and Promise of Humane Education

Image courtesy of Osvaldo Gago via Creative Commons.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Empathy’s Role in Education

Check out this TEDx talk by Sam Richards, a sociology professor and co-director of Race Relations at Penn State:

At the Institute for Humane Education, we identify four elements as key to providing quality humane education. They include:

  1. Providing accurate information about pressing issues and challenges of our time.
  2. Fostering the 3 Cs of curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking.
  3. Instilling the 3 Rs of reverence, respect, and responsibility.
  4. Offering positive choices and the tools for becoming a solutionary.

Note how masterfully Sam Richards, in just 19 minutes, manages to employ the first three elements, while leaving viewers pondering their choices and their roles in addressing some of the challenges we face. What I particularly appreciate, as a humane educator, is that the entire talk, entitled “A Radical Experiment in Empathy,” is aimed at evoking the compassion that can lead us toward critical and creative thinking and problem-solving for a better world.

This is such an important talk which everyone should see, and a incredibly useful tool for teachers exploring complex, challenging, and critical issues in classrooms.

Zoe Weil, President, Institute for Humane Education
Author of Most Good, Least Harm, The Power and Promise of Humane Education, and Above All, Be Kind

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Teaching for America? Teaching for the World!

Tom Friedman’s op-ed in The New York Times, “Teaching for America,” is yet another cry for major reform of our education system, but this time with a twist: for the sake of national security. As Friedman writes: “When I came to Washington in 1988, the cold war was ending and the hot beat was national security and the State Department. If I were a cub reporter today, I’d still want to be covering the epicenter of national security – but that would be the Education Department.”

Why national security? Because, as President Obama says, whoever “out-educates us today is going to out-compete us tomorrow.” But not only do we need to reform education for economic national security, apparently we also need to reform education for military national security. Friedman quotes Secretary of Education Arne Duncan who said, “One of the more unusual and sobering press conferences I participated in last year was the release of a report by a group of top retired generals and admirals. Here was the stunning conclusion of their report: 75 percent of young Americans, between the ages of 17 to 24, are unable to enlist in the military today because they have failed to graduate from high school, have a criminal record, or are physically unfit.” Later in the essay, Friedman quotes Duncan again when he points out that in South Korea “they refer to their teachers as ‘nation builders.’”

Another expert Friedman quotes is Tony Wagner, author of “The Global Achievement Gap,” who explains it this way. “There are three basic skills that students need if they want to thrive in a knowledge economy: the ability to do critical thinking and problem-solving; the ability to communicate effectively; and the ability to collaborate.”

I basically agree with this last statement, though I wouldn’t limit those three skills as essentials for thriving in the “knowledge economy.” To me they are essentials in the most important work each one of us needs to embrace: contributing to innovative solutions for a world in crisis. These skills must be taught in part to enable the next generation to thrive in the knowledge economy, but more importantly to be solutionaries for a healthy, just and thriving world.

I was with Wagner until Friedman quoted him again. Apparently Wagner thinks we should create a West Point for teachers: “We need a new National Education Academy, modeled after our military academies, to raise the status of the profession and to support the R.& D. that is essential for reinventing teaching, learning and assessment in the 21st century.”

The military analogy threw me, because the grave threats we face are global, not national. Our economies are inextricably entwined. Our environments are interconnected and interdependent. “Nation-building” and “competing for jobs” are ultimately going to be outmoded schemas in a world in which collaboration and mutual problem-solving are required to avert catastrophes. A military analogy is exactly the wrong one for our educational crisis. Nation-building is a 20th, not a 21st century vision for educational goals.

But Friedman is right when he focuses much of his essay on teachers. It is teachers who will prepare a generation of solutionaries, or not. It is teachers who will instill critical and creative thinking skills among their students, or not. It is teachers who will find ways to infuse their curricula with meaning, importance, and relevancy (despite the standardized tests their students must pass that largely lack these attributes), or not. And Arne Duncan is right to seek to emulate those countries whose teachers were all in the top third of their colleges and who are paid good salaries for their high-status professions. This, more than anything, will help.

But until we decide what we’re educating the next generation for, we will still flounder. Are we educating a generation simply to compete in the global economy or to build our nation? Or are we educating a generation of solutionaries who collaborate, communicate, and think critically and creatively to solve the grave challenges of our world?

Let’s not just cover the new and exciting “education beat.” Let’s define what it’s for.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm and The Power and Promise of Humane Education

Image courtesy of marcokalmann via Creative Commons.

Teachers & Community Educators: inspire your students to become leaders & change agents for a healthy, peaceful, sustainable world. Sign up for the next session of our 30-day online course, Teaching for a Positive Future (February 7-March 14, 2011). Special rates for groups of teachers.

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Taxes: What’s the MOGO (most good) Choice?

A number of years ago, a friend proudly told me about how she kept certain income from the government in order not to pay taxes. Her assumption was that I would find this admirable because our government was using a hefty share of our tax dollars for unethical wars. Like her, I oppose such wars. But I was not impressed at all. I asked her if she took that money that legally should have gone to pay her taxes and donated it to charities or causes she believed in. She stared at me in confusion and said no. This had apparently never crossed her mind. I explained that I thought that it could be a noble act to refuse to pay taxes, but only if one took the same amount of money and put it toward good works and did so publicly as an act of civil disobedience. She quickly changed the subject.

Over the years, I’ve been surprised by just how many people I know who withhold information to avoid paying taxes. These are not libertarians who philosophically oppose taxation, but progressives who believe in social security, medicaid, educational financial aid, interstate highways, funding for the arts and sciences, and so on. There is plenty that they don’t believe in, and I know how galling it can be to know that one’s taxes are going toward immoral, violent acts, whether to fund illegal wars or cruel experiments on animals, or to subsidize unhealthy and inhumane foods. But if that is how we feel, then I believe as U.S. citizens we have a responsibility to participate in the democratic process to the best of our ability (and to transform that process so that it actually is democratic). We have the choice to be activists and changemakers. And we have the option of civil disobedience, a brave decision to embody one’s values and then face the inevitable consequences.

What’s the MOGO (most good) choice regarding taxes? That’s for each of us to decide for ourselves, based on our values, but I would argue that “gaming” the system to avoid paying taxes and keeping the money for oneself isn’t MOGO at all.

Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm

Like my blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 437 other followers